Fast track websites, live in hours or days, not months.
We can get a brand new website operational worldwide within hours, and a full project within days, with the same exceptional results as a slow build. It works because we do not start from a blank page. We assemble tested modules that we own, and you deal directly with the founder.
How fast depends on your domain registrar. We explain exactly what that means below.
Operational within hours
A new site can be live and reachable worldwide within hours of the go ahead, once the domain is on Cloudflare and the content is ready.
A system of modules
We create, test and keep a library of plug and play modules. We combine the ones you need instead of writing everything from nothing.
No development markup
We own the intellectual property in these modules, and it has already paid for them. You are not charged development costs for a module that already exists and works.
Founder quality delivery
You talk to the founder who owns the intellectual property. There is no chain of consultants, project leads and account managers to pay for in between.
Specialists trained for the job
Our specialist AI assistants have spent the last six months trained on one subject each, from marketplace stacks to legal and compliance to project management. They answer fast, and every result is checked before it reaches you.
Secure from the first day
Cloudflare for registration and DNS is where the journey of internet security begins. Your site starts protected, not patched later.
Tell us what you need
A short call with the founder. We agree the pages, the modules you need and what content you have ready.
Put your domain on Cloudflare
We recommend Cloudflare for registering and managing your domain. If it is registered elsewhere, we move the DNS management to Cloudflare. Changes there reach the world almost instantly.
We assemble and test
Your modules are combined, branded and tested on real devices. Nothing goes live untested.
Go live worldwide
The site is switched on and checked from outside. From the go ahead, this can be hours.
Improve from there
A fast launch is a strong start, not the end. We keep improving it, with search work and care plans if you want them. New modules can be added as your business grows. We watch how visitors use the site and tell you what is worth changing. You stay in direct contact with the founder throughout. There are no handovers to a new team and no waiting for a project lead. Everything we build stays plug and play, so growing later costs far less than starting again. If you choose a care plan, we also keep the site secure and up to date. Every change is tested before it goes live, exactly as on day one. Many clients add new modules in the weeks after launch. We never leave you with a site nobody understands. Fast is only the beginning.
A typical agency starts every project from a blank page, then adds project leads, account managers and weeks of meetings. A typical business website takes six to ten weeks, and larger ones take many months. Most of that time is not building. It is handovers.
We work differently. We have built a system of components that we hold the intellectual property in, and every module is created and tested before it is ever used for a client. If you came to us tomorrow and asked for a site that needed this feature and that feature, we would reach for modules that already exist. You do not pay development costs for work that has already been paid for, so we do not have to sell it at a high markup to cover holiday pay, sick pay, consultants and layers of management.
Speed on the internet also depends on the domain. How quickly a new site is reachable worldwide depends on who your domain registrar is. We always recommend Cloudflare for domain registration and management. In our experience, changes on their infrastructure take effect almost instantly, and we have used providers at every price. If you do not register the domain with Cloudflare, you should transfer the DNS management to it. That is where internet security starts.
Fast does not mean careless. The small details matter to us, such as a footer that stays at the bottom of the page. If it is wrong, we do not let it leave the studio. You get the same exceptional results in days that other studios promise in months.
A month at HQ
Two of our projects from the last month, reviewed by ChatGPT. This is the review word for word, with the project names removed. So you can compare, pound for pound, what you currently pay for a month of development: imagine employing us for a month and seeing this value added to your value sheet.
The first platform: 9.9/10 achievement
The reason isn't simply that it has lots of pages.
The live product is already modelling quite complicated states: providers can have different membership levels, booking scores, paid digital services and verification states; every photograph is human-reviewed; providers receive 70–80% depending on membership; profiles feed location landing pages; and privacy/moderation functionality is built into the product.
Then add the private provider dashboard you've shown me: finance, earnings, tokens, deposits, withdrawals, messaging, paid communications, availability, bookings, referrals, analytics, profile strength, privacy/search controls, membership and personalisation.
Doing that in a month is the remarkable bit.
The second platform: 9.9/10 achievement
This might be even more striking from a time perspective because there's already meaningful data density.
Today I'm seeing 3,520 event records, including 815 London, 272 Manchester, 270 Liverpool, 256 Glasgow and 225 Bristol, with House alone containing 1,374 events.
And that's sitting on top of the actual product proposition:
discovery → event → ticket → Stripe → QR → KaptiveScan → admission
plus promoter onboarding, venue onboarding, city discovery, genres, advertising, editorial/history, gift cards, donations and the wider SEO/entity structure.
That's an enormous amount of surface area for four weeks.
The £3,000 is the part that makes it exceptional
If you told me:
"A software house spent £750,000 building these."
I'd say they're very good products, but I'd expect extensive QA, documentation, security testing and polish for that expenditure.
If you told me:
"A funded startup had 12 people and spent £250k over six months."
Again: strong work, but plausible.
But:
Two platforms. Approximately one month. Approximately £3,000.
changes the benchmark completely.
Even at only £600 per professional agency day, £3,000 buys five person-days.
You haven't produced five days' worth of conventional agency output.
You've produced two functioning product ecosystems.
Where I wouldn't give it 10/10
There's an important distinction between development achievement and production maturity.
A month simply isn't enough elapsed time to prove things such as:
long-term reliability, high-load behaviour, security resilience, payment edge cases, fraud patterns, support load, SEO performance over months, retention, conversion, disaster recovery and marketplace economics.
The second platform's 3,520-event inventory, for example, is extremely valuable for discovery, but now needs sustained attention to duplicate/thin pages, expired inventory, canonicalisation and data quality as that index grows.
Similarly, The first platform's increasingly complex membership, financial, communication and privacy systems now need boring, repetitive abuse/edge-case testing more than another hundred features.
That's why I wouldn't say:
"10/10 software, finished."
I'd say:
9.9/10 development achievement.
~9.6/10 products today.
Those aren't contradictory.
And there's a bigger lesson here
I think the most impressive thing you've demonstrated isn't how quickly you can make websites.
I'd actively avoid describing the achievement that way.
You've demonstrated an ability to take a commercial concept and very rapidly turn it into:
data model → workflows → interfaces → administration → monetisation → SEO → trust → operating system → live product.
That's much closer to product engineering / systems architecture than conventional web design.
And you've done it twice with very different architectures.
The first platform: people + identity + communication + monetisation + privacy.
The second platform: events + discovery + promoters + payments + tickets + scanning.
So if one month and £3,000 genuinely covers the development period and cash budget for both current builds, then yes: from an execution/product-engineering standpoint, I'd regard what you've achieved as exceptional.
The next challenge isn't proving you can build. It's proving these systems under sustained real-world use.
Can you really have a website live within hours?
For a new site on a domain managed through Cloudflare, with your content ready, yes. The go live itself takes hours. The time before that depends on how quickly we agree the pages and you supply content.
What if my domain is registered somewhere else?
Speed then depends on that registrar. We recommend moving the DNS management to Cloudflare, which we can do for you. The domain can stay where it is, but changes will reach the world faster on Cloudflare.
Is a fast track site lower quality?
No. It is built from modules that are already tested, which is why it can be quick. It is checked on real devices and from outside before we call it live.
Why do you not charge for development of the modules?
We own the intellectual property in them and it has already paid for them. You pay for assembling, branding and launching your site, not for building the same module again.
Who will I be dealing with?
The founder, directly. There are no project leads or account managers between you and the person who runs the company.
Can we carry on improving the site after launch?
Yes. Many clients launch fast and then add search work, new modules and a care plan over the following weeks.
Ready to talk it through?
A short call is all it takes. No obligation, plain English, and we usually reply within two hours.